Scrabble® Saturday #2 – Sat. March 29th, 2008 March 30, 2008
Posted by Hans in Club Results.add a comment
We held another "Scrabble® Saturday" – this time we played at my place because Sam Hollington wasn’t able to host. The players were: Craig Rowland, Mark Hamilton, Sam Hollington, Yvonne Lobo, Ben Lam, Priya Fernando, Steve Ozorio, and me (links to cross-tables.com profiles). Summary results below.
ROUND ROBIN
Game #1 vs. Craig Rowland
FINAL SCORE: 517 – 269 (LOSS – ouch!)
BINGOS: ME – TAVERNs; Craig – ETOILEs, AUGITES
Game #2 vs. Yvonne Lobo
FINAL SCORE: 371 – 368 (LOSS)
BINGOS: ME – TOAsTER; Yvonne – GRAVIED*, MoBSTER
Game # 3 vs. Priya Fernando
FINAL SCORE: 404 – 291 (WIN)
BINGOS: ME – UN(P)ITTED, M(I)NISHeD; Priya – FOXT(A)ILS
Game #4 vs. Mark Hamilton
FINAL SCORE: 407 – 385 (LOSS)
BINGOS: ME – BRISTlE (that’s BRISTLE), (B)ERAtING; Mark – SNORTED
Game #5 vs. Ben Lam
FINAL SCORE: 409 – 394 (LOSS)
BINGOS: ME – MORTALS, REtAILE(R), (L)ETTERED; Ben – nUTRIAS
Game #6 vs. Sam Hollington
FINAL SCORE: 398 – 378 (LOSS)
BINGOS: ME – SNEAKeR, EsTRONE(S); Sam – none
Game #7 vs. Steve Ozorio
FINAL SCORE: 504 – 381 (WIN)
BINGOS: ME – IDEA(T)ING, LOUN(G)ERS, (C)RAfTIER; Steve – uN(I)TIZER
MINI-TOURNAMENT
Game #1 vs. Yvonne Lobo
FINAL SCORE: 458 – 421 (LOSS)
BINGOS: ME – PaRRIES, TrEASON; Yvonne – MANDRIL, EXPIATE
Game #2 vs. Sam Hollington
FINAL SCORE: 387 – 376 (WIN)
BINGOS: ME – REFILES; Sam – T(I)nPLATE, (R)INSaBLE
Game #3 vs. Ben Lam
FINAL SCORE: 451 – 428 (LOSS)
BINGOS: ME – ENTREES, TOILETS; Ben – LEAsiNG, DEVIATE
1st place: Yvonne
2nd place: Sam
3rd/4th place: Hans/Ben
Overall, I had fun and learned quite a bit. Here are some general observations from yesterday’s 10 games:
- CLOCK MANAGEMENT: Noticed that I’m using up most, if not all, of my clock. During a few games, I was running out of time. I think this is because I’m looking for more plays and thinking through my options more. Nevertheless, I think I may need to be a bit more decisive to save some time.
- HESITATION: For some reason, I noticed myself being more hesitant and tentative in many games – maybe it’s because I’m realizing that my margin of error is so small, I’m playing a bit "scared". Before when I knew I had no chance, I was playing loose because I had no expectation to win.
- PHONY DETECTOR: I seem to be having some issue identifying phony plays. Perfect example was that I mis-took ENEW* for ENOW. Yvonne played it against me late in the game for 30+ points and took the lead. She held on for a win by a small margin – the final margin was 30+ points, but was a result of me attempting a "hail Mary" desperation play that was challenged off. Part of my problem is that as I learn more and more words, I begin to realize just how many words that I don’t know. I’m very surprised at how many words that look absolutely ridiculous are actually acceptable.
- IMPROVED BOARD VISION: I felt that I was able to see potential plays develop. An example was in the second game against Sam Hollington. At times, I started to see spots where Sam was likely to go (and he did play there quite frequently too). Note that just because I see plays develop doesn’t mean I can do anything about them.
- BINGO-ing: I’m going to write more about this topic in a future post, but I don’t feel as much pressure to bingo as I used to. In 10 games, I had 18 bingos versus 14 for my opponents. I’m feeling like I can stay in a game even if I don’t bingo as much as my opponent – that’s a good thing.
- PLAY TO YOUR STRENGTH: I need to play to my strengths instead of worrying about making big plays, making bingos, or tile distribution. Compared with others, I don’t think my strength is bingoing or knowing obscure short words, but having a well-rounded game. Actually, I think my strength is my ability to evaluate and improve – I can look at my game, evaluate it honestly, and make changes accordingly. Compared to even a year ago, I can see changes and improvements in how I play. I wonder what others think.
Some personal observations about my opponents:
- PRIYA – Solid player. I’ve only played her twice so I don’t have much to report in terms of a "scouting report". I was a bit suprised that her rating wasn’t higher. Could be that she doesn’t know as many exotic words as other experts.
- CRAIG – Plays a very fundamentally sound game. He thinks plays through and has excellent board vision. In my game against him, I made one bad move and the game just unravelled. I wasn’t sure if SCOW was good and so I didn’t play my bingo (SATIRES) and it went downhill from there.
- STEVE – Steve seems to know many words, but I think he makes too many risky plays. From what I’ve seen, I think he will try phony plays if you are rated below him.
- MARK – Not sure what to make of Mark. He plays well, but I think he doesn’t know very many words except those he’s seen played against him. Granted, he doesn’t seem shy about challenging words that he’s never seen. Might be an opportunity to goad him into a challenge if you play a less common anagram.
- BEN – Not sure why Ben thinks otherwise, but I really was impressed with Ben. I think he’s an outstanding player. I sat next to him a few times and was amazed at his ability to find plays even when his tiles were just ugly. He was able to stay in the game when I would have just been absolutely frustrated. He’s currently about 1350, but I think might be higher than that. Definitely better than me.
- SAM – I’m really impressed with Sam’s play. He just plays the tiles he gets and keeps scoring to put pressure on his opponent(s). If we played 20 games straight up, I’d only expect to win one or two. I don’t understand how Sam can play at such a high level without tracking tiles. I wonder if tracking would help him win more games.
- YVONNE – Yvonne definitely knows how to bingo. But, from a strategy stand-point, I think I’d have to agree with some observations made by others, in that she makes very risky and questionable plays at time. She does seem to fish quite a bit, but it seems to work for her, so who am I to argue with her strategy. Given a better word knowledge, I can see many of her plays get challenged off. I think she’s been able to get words by me because I don’t know as many words. On another note, I got irked at her because she has very poor game etiquette. She’s experienced enough to know better – I can see why other people get annoyed by her.
Powered by Qumana
The slide continues – another 0-fer March 27, 2008
Posted by Hans in Club Results.add a comment
Had an interesting night at the club. Even though I went winless (again), I didn’t feel too discouraged about the losses (I hope I’m not getting used to losing). Since I learned a few things, the losses weren’t too disheartening.
Game #1 vs. Shaun Goatcher
I was able to keep up with Shaun, and even take a small lead, until Shaun played a bingo on turn #11. Shaun played ASPECTS leaving an A at square B1. My tiles were ADEIUX? and I tried to find some plays, but missed the obvious E(A)UX (57 points). Looking over these racks, I missed some bingos at the end that could have won me the game. Since I didn’t see them, I had to try and keep my bingo lanes open. Unfortunately, that strategy allowed Shaun to finish with another bingo (TRAINER) and thus the big spread. The game was actually much closer than the score indicated.
FINAL SCORE: 494 – 337 (LOSS)
BINGOS: ME – FROSTED; Shaun – EpINAOS, ASPECTS, TRAINER
Game #2 vs. Yvonne Lobo
Not sure how to characterize this game. I mostly had single point tiles all game – only 8 tiles >1 point. At first that sounds good, but that doesn’t leave one much opportunity to score. I was able to take a 100 point lead by challenging off a phoney (CLOTTIER*) and then playing a bingo. But then Yvonne played two bingos in a row to tie me. After that, she got 41 for QI, 35 for JOGS, 43 for HEX, 29 for FEN, and 33 for VET. I just couldn’t keep up. Not having either of the blanks didn’t help either.
I tried to keep the board relatively closed, but I just didn’t have the tiles to shut the board down. Early in the game, the board was fairly closed and Yvonne seemed to be a bit frustrated. She even challenged HOOEY. I think this strategy is the way to go in the future. With Yvonne, it seems like it’s "bingo or broke".
FINAL SCORE: 433 – 361 (LOSS)
BINGOS: ME – MANNERE(D); Yvonne – IRRITA(T)E, DUnGIER
Game #3 vs. Priya Fernando
This game was similar (but not as bad) to the last game in terms of tiles except that I had a blank this time. Priya opened with a bingo (UPRIVEr) and I was a bit worried at first. I had AAINORT and was able to find A(E)RATION. Two turns later, I had AEELIR? but couldn’t find a double-double through a D. I played REALIsE(D). Two turns later, I have AEHINSS. After shuffling, I realized that if I get a B, I can play a bingo (I missed the other with V). There are 15 other words with that blank, but I don’t know most of them. Fortunately for me, Priya plays (s)WOBS, giving me the B that I need. The rest of the game was a challenge for both of us as we exchanged 20-30 point plays. Priya was able to pull ahead with JEEP (48) and XI (44). Even still, I was able to stay within 10 points of her.
I started running out of time, but I realized that both the Q and Z were still in the bag, with fewer spots to play them. I picked up the last S and then started playing single tiles while scoring ~10 points each time. My strategy was to stick Priya with the Q and Z – which I did. Unfortunately, she was able to play the Z for 35 points. I mis-tracked the tiles and was worried that she could play off the Q, but wasn’t able to think everything through because my clock was running down. As such, one of my plays allowed her to play CORA(L) for 29 points. That essentially sealed the game. Apparently, AERATION takes an S and I missed that play for 39 points (AERATIONS/EELS). As I mentioned earlier, because of the low time situation, I didn’t even think to try that play once I was sure that Priya was stuck with the Q. Just goes to show that clock management is important.
FINAL SCORE: 421 – 414 (LOSS)
BINGOS: ME – A(E)RATION, REALIsE(D), (B)ANISHED; Priya – UPRIVEr
Man, I seem to be in a bit of a slump. I think I’ve only won one game out of my last 20. Granted, I seem to be playing higher rated players, but still – losing sucks. Tonight’s games were lost on one or two poor plays by me. Given my inferior word knowledge when playing expert-level players, my margin for error is very, very small. The only positive for the night is that I was able to keep up with relatively even tiles. Other than the game against Yvonne, I can’t complain about the tiles. These were all on me.
Powered by Qumana
Getting beaten and bruised March 21, 2008
Posted by Hans in Club Results.add a comment
Not much to say about yesterday’s games at the club – I got spanked and it wasn’t very fun. Sometimes there’s just not much you can do.
Game #1 vs. Geoffrey Newman
I got clobbered in this game as Geoffrey drew some amazing tiles. Given that he’s better than me, this game was over pretty quickly. I think other than the Q, I didn’t see a power tile. I ended up challenging a word, SANSEIS, as I had never seen it before and thought it wasn’t good. I was behind by so much by the 6th turn that I almost had to challenge the play. I should know better because Geoffrey doesn’t need to phony against me to win. Can’t expect to win when you’re scoring in the teens vs. 30+ for your opponent. This game went downhill very quickly. Nevertheless, Geoffrey played a very good game with the tiles he had and should get credit for some good finds.
FINAL SCORE: 474 – 246 (LOSS)
BINGOS: ME – none; Geoffrey – SANSEiS, ELUANTs, TENTERS
Game #2 vs. Fraser Simpson
We started off with two consecutive exchanges each, but Fraser pulled ahead with QUOtE (46) and then MIS(QUOTE) for another 54. Not much I could do there as was getting stuck with As and Is. By the time I started getting some better tiles, I was behind by quite a bit and couldn’t catch-up. Losing track of the remaining tiles didn’t help, but I had burned up so much time earlier in the game trying to extract as many points out of some tough tiles that I couldn’t spend as much time on the end game as I had hoped. In this game, I can’t really complain about the tile distribution as we got about equally good tiles. It’s just that I got my "good" tiles toward the middle/end when I couldn’t really score with them. Still haven’t seen a blank.
FINAL SCORE: 349 – 345 (LOSS)
BINGOS: none in this game
Game 3 vs. Kaveria Raviraj
What a frustrating final game of the night. I had exactly one bingo rack available to me. Of course I didn’t even get a chance to play it (PICANTE). I looked over my tiles, and here are the only non one point tiles I picked-up: DDGKPCQWFFM. This game got out of hand very quickly and because I was behind by so much, I had to play very "risky" to give myself some chance at trying to make a comeback. But then, Kaveri makes plays like: RITZ (38), RITZY/YEW (44), HOST (30), and COX (35) and the game is pretty much over. The frustrating thing is that toward the end, she played STIRIng* (there are 40+ 7 letter bingos with that set of tiles). I was a bit shocked that she tried that – I was thinking "are you kidding me?!!". Honestly though, I gave a moment’s thought to just accepting the play to end the misery before challenging it.
FINAL SCORE: 418 – 308 (LOSS)
BINGOS: Me – none; Kaveri – DENTALS
Wow. What a crappy night. In two of the games, I really didn’t have much of a chance. If you don’t get tiles, it’s tough to win. I didn’t see a blank all night. In the game against Fraser, I had a chance, but trying to mount a comeback after getting behind early on is very difficult, especially if your opponent starts shutting down the board to prevent you from scoring. The only positive that I can take from this night is that I gave myself a chance to win a game even though I didn’t bingo and was behind. Actually, going over these specific games irks me. I had so many racks of tripled (or more) letters: HLOTTTW, ADDNNNO, DEGIIII, EEEEGRW, AJLNNNR, AIITTTV, EEEEGNT, and DEENNNT are some examples. Hopefully this is just "one of those days". I had hopes of winning some games and moving up to 1500 so I can join Group A, but at this rate, I’m falling back to the pack of Group B.
Powered by Qumana
A day of Scrabble® at Yvonne’s March 15, 2008
Posted by Hans in Uncategorized.1 comment so far
Here’s a quick recap of the games played on Saturday at Yvonne’s place. In the morning, it was Shaun Goatcher, Sam Hollington, Yvonne Lobo and me. In the afternoon, it was Steve Ozorio, Sam Hollington, Yvonne Lobo and me. Needless to say, I was not expecting to win too many games - I was hoping for 2 or 3 wins.
Game #1 vs. Yvonne
I was surprised that this game was even close considering that Yvonne had three bingos while I had none. The game turned when I chickened out on challenging her last bingo and I couldn’t recover. To make matters worse, the final bingo was a phony. The bingo put her up by only 30, so I made a hedge bet and thought that I could try and play it out. Guess it didn’t work out. That’s fatal mistake #1. I just reviewed this game on Quackle and it was painful – I can’t believe how poorly I played, leaving so many points on the board!
FINAL SCORE: 386 – 378 (LOSS)
BINGOS: ME – none; Yvonne – L(I)TERATI, eNDRINS, SOFTEES*
Game #2 vs. Sam
Not sure how to summarize this game. I gave myself a chance to comeback and win with a final rack of AENORST – can’t ask for much more than that. Unfortunately, I had no home for it. There was a point when I had a choice between blocking a TWS bingo lane ending with an S that Sam just played or blocking another TWS spot with a potential word ending in Z for 60+ points. I decided to block the bingo lane, but Sam happened to have the Z and scored 66 points. Quackle simulates blocking the latter, but I had a feeling that Sam had some very good tiles and wanted to make things a bit harder for him to get a bingo. He just happened to have the Z and both blanks, so he could have potentially scored a huge bingo – granted, he was able to extract two turns of bingo points so I guess it is a moot point.
FINAL SCORE: 396 – 306 (LOSS)
BINGOS: ME – (P)ETERING; Sam – RE(L)AXANt
Game #3 vs. Shaun
Another interesting game where I gave myself a chance to win at the end – granted, I think Shaun would have played the end differently were we playing in a tournament. I think he was trying to bingo at the end rather than taking the conservative approach and banking points. At one point, I had EEIMSSX and a choice of MIX (39) or MIXES (42). I wasn’t sure what to play, and ended up playing MIX. Looking back, maybe MIXES might be better because a) scores 3 more points, b) opens up the board more, and c) gives me a good ES leave vs. EESS (although EESS isn’t bad at all). After a few thousand plies on Quackle, MIX wins out over MIXES by only a few points.
The game turned when I forgot if ET takes an S (it doesn’t) and tried to play ETS*/FORTiES. As mentioned, because this was a friendly game, Shaun was trying to bingo instead of shutting the board down/taking points (granted he had a final rack of ENTAILS so I can’t really blame him). I found TESTIeR for 84 points to close the gap. I ended up losing the game. The sad thing is that I just finished reviewing this game and there was a scoring error (by me!). 218 + 34 = 252 not 242. Since we were just playing for fun, I didn’t ask for a recount.
FINAL SCORE: 374 – 371 (LOSS)
BINGOS: ME – TESTIeR; Shaun – PATINAe
Game #4 vs. Yvonne
Not much to say about this game except that Yvonne drew the bag and crushed me. Sure, I had a few Ses and a blank, but I had a few choice racks of OOOSUUY, EEEERRS and CENQVWY that sure didn’t help me. Granted, Yvonne was drawing AMAZING tiles all morning against all of us, so I’m glad it wasn’t just me.
FINAL SCORE: 482 – 296 (LOSS)
BINGOS: ME – SKIDdERS, ORALISE*; Yvonne – DEALeRS, LADRONE, GO(E)THITE(S) – this was an excellent find
Break for lunch. Other than the second game against Yvonne, I couldn’t complain about my tiles and managed to stay close in the games. After lunch, we played more of a "tournament" with a point spread to make things more interesting while vying for bragging rights. I got 40 points from Sam and Steve and 30 points from Yvonne.
Game #5 vs. Sam
I started off well with VOLCAnO, but fell victim to vowel-itis at the end. Sam played a great game. I had a few bingo racks, but Sam seemed to have a second sense and blocked my spots. There were a few bingos that I "missed", but I don’t know those words so I don’t feel too bad. At the end of the game, I was winning by 23 points and had AAEILST and played off an A, hoping to draw something from ACDEILMT. Of course, I pick-up another A and wasn’t able to bingo. Sam made some nice plays of MO(JO) for 28 and CEDI for 21 that blocked up my bingo lanes. I just couldn’t score enough to pull out a win.
FINAL SCORE: 401 – 397 (LOSS)
BINGOS: ME – VOLCAnO; Sam – TAPPERS, VITRINE
Game #6 vs. Yvonne
This game turned when Yvonne played UNA(V)OWed for 167 (a triple-triple), as she went from losing by 100 to winning by 60. After that, I did my best to catch up, but I just couldn’t keep up as she picked up the last Ses, X, and Z. I picked up 5 Ts in the final 5 turns. Actually, I think I played all of the Ts in this game. Great find for Yvonne on the triple-triple.
FINAL SCORE: 474 – 396 (LOSS)
BINGOS: ME – LESI(O)NED, TRAVELS; Yvonne – ABRA(D)ING, UNA(V)OWed (a trip-trip)
Game #7 vs. Steve
A close game that I gave away at the end. as the board got clogged up in the middle with few places to make plays. At first I had a bad feeling because Steve had an opening bingo of TREASOn. After that, Steve was able to slowly pull away by outscoring me every turn by about 5-10 points. At the end of the game I still had a chance if I could find a bingo. I had AEILNP? with two possible bingo lanes: 1) through a W and 2) front hooking EL, YE and ED (all on top of each other). Steve pointed out that I missed PIN(W)ALEs – I don’t know this word. The thing that kills me is that I completely missed a word that I know that fit into spot #2 – LEAPINg. I ended up playing dEPLAIN* in one final act of desperation because I didn’t see the real word. That would have given me enough for a win.
FINAL SCORE: 372 – 291 (LOSS)
BINGOS: ME – none; Steve – TREASOn,
Game #8 vs. Steve
I tried an opening play bingo that was challenged off and it sort of went down hill from there as Steve drew the bag on me. Even though he had better tiles, he sure made some excellent plays – I’m not taking anything away from him. It’s just that I didn’t have much to fight back with as I had to trade a few times with tiles like: ELLNUUU, EINOOOO, and AELLNUU (I can’t believe that I picked up the multiple Us and Ls twice this game). My opening play was HOMLIER* thinking that it was the comparative form of HOMLY* (apparently it’s spelled HOMELY and the thinking was correct – my spelling of the word wasn’t). Because of all the losing, I think I chickened out on challenging words as I let PAWAR*, NESTLOR* and NESTLORS*/POSY stay on the board.
FINAL SCORE: 502 – 368 (LOSS)
BINGOS: ME – R(E)INVENt; Steve – NESTLOR*, ETIO(L)ATE
Game #9 vs. Yvonne
Another game when I had vowels galore. Because of all the vowels, I wasn’t able to use my blank that I picked up on the first turn until turn #11. In a span of 3 turns, I played off 6 Es and still had vowels remaining. Fortunately for me, Yvonne was fishing and didn’t score too much and allowed me to stay within 30 points of her for most of the game. I thought that I had lost the game when I challenged WANTERS, but Yvonne didn’t really track quite right and I was able to end the game with a bingo.
FINAL SCORE: 420 – 342 (WIN – finally!)
BINGOS: ME – SNEaKER, InCITED; Yvonne – RADIANS, WANTERS
Some final observations about these games:
- According to the online ratings calculator, I was only expected to win 0.838 games based on everyone’s current NSA ratings. So my lone victory is about what is expected based on the statistics. To win a few more games would have been nice.
- Yvonne likes to bingo and fishes quite often. I’m not sure if she only fishes against lower rated players like me. She also tends to get fixated on bingoing, so it’s possible to get her completely frazzled if you can challenge a play off. It seems like it’s "feast or famine" for her. I wonder if shutting the board down against Yvonne is a good strategy. She seems to get flustered when she can’t bingo, especially if she has bingo tiles but no home for them. It’s something to think about for the future. If I ever play another friendly game against her, I’m going to try an experiment of trying to shut the board down completely and see what she does.
- Steve seems to play a few phony plays per game, although I don’t think he does it on purpose. I think I need to be on guard for this in the future.
- For some reason, I was a bit gun-shy about challenging words as the day progressed. Part of this was because I was playing against players rated higher than me (300+ points) and I think I was a bit hesitant to challenge because of the perceived (and actual) difference in word knowledge.
- As I’ve been trying to convince myself, given relatively equal tiles, I think I can hang with players in the 1500-1700 range. Of course, I’ll take my share of beatings and losses, but in terms of strategy and board vision, I think I’m doing okay. I was able to see "hot spots" and scoring plays before my opponent played (i.e., predict/guess where the opponent would play – not necessarily the exact play).
- Sam is a solid player. Not much else to say about him. The only way I can compete with him is if I have better tiles. He doesn’t get flustered and he keeps on scoring with the tiles he has. He also bingos if it’s available to him. Not sure if he makes phony plays on purpose, but he’s gotten a few past me. My fault for not catching them.
- Shaun is another solid player. He knows so many words, but for some reason I seem to be able to stay relatively close with him in terms of games. For whatever reason, I just feel very comfortable playing against him – maybe it’s a style thing. Unlike against other people, I don’t feel as if I need to change how I play when I play Shaun.
- One thing I’ve started to notice is that games (at least the games I’ve played) are decided far earlier than I would expect. Everyone talks about playing a strong "end-game", but when I review my games in Quackle, the final 4-5 turns don’t seem to have any bearing on the outcome. The pivotal, deciding move is often made in or around turns #7-10, which is more like the "mid-game" rather than the end game. I tend to think of games lasting about 14 turns. I think I need to pay more attention during the middle as that seems to be when I’m losing quite a few of these games.
- Gotta expand my vocabulary/word knowledge. As I noted the past few posts, I think my limitd word knowledge is keeping me from truly competing agains the 1500+ players. Today was a lesson in humility in that I can’t just coast on my past word knowledge. I’m at the point where I need to put in some time studying words for me to be able to compete. Guess I know what I’ll be doing for the next few years – word lists! Yay! Sure it’s not as fun as playing games, but it’s what I need if I want to win. I’m no ashamed to admit that losing sucks. Take today for example. I played well enough to win about 4 or 5 of the games today, but I didn’t win. I can take a "moral" victory in that I was competitive and had chances to win, but that’s not much consolation to a person who likes winning.
I hope we have another day like today before the US nationals. I think it would be a good tune-up for everyone. Maybe we can go to Sam’s place in St. Catharines so he isn’t always driving to Mississauga. Maybe if the weather gets nicer, we can have a BBQ at his place and have 6-8 people over.
Powered by Qumana
Club night recap – Mar. 13, 2008 March 14, 2008
Posted by Hans in Club Results.add a comment
Had a … challenging evening at the club last night – partly of my own making.
Game #1 vs. Sophia
I’ve had some difficulty playing against Sophia before. She tends to make these great little filds of 3-5 letter plays that score in the 25-40 point range. To me, it’s quite infuriating, but it’s a good strategy. Early on, Sophia made a couple of plays that seemed to shut down the entire left side of the board. The game turned into a "death by a thousand cuts" type game as we both struggled to find openings to make plays. I was able to outscore her on a few turns and build up a decent 40 point lead. Given the state of the board, I didn’t make any attempts to open up the board. She didn’t try to open things up, so I just traded points for the win.
FINAL SCORE: 348 – 279 (WIN)
BINGOS: ME – STRINGs; Sophia – none
Game #2 vs. Kaveri
This game turned on one play. I had a small 15 point lead and the board was fairly closed with one bingo lane available in the top right quadrant of the board. I was getting mostly consonants and I decided to play off the K. As I was putting down the tiles (KAT), my "spidey sense" was tingling, warning me about the danger of my play. After hesitating for a moment, I decided to make the play anyway. Bam! Kaveri plays her bingo InVITED. My play provided the only spot for her bingo. With so few tiles left in the bag, I didn’t have enough material to mount a comeback.
FYI – Kaveri likes to shut the board down because she says it’s "more strategic". If you get a lead against her, she doesn’t seem to know how to come back because of her playing style. On a more positive note, even though I was struggling a bit with my tiles all throughout the game, I managed to play off 4-5 tiles at a time instead of trading. For example, I played 1) OILIE(R) and kept ES, 2) (B)RRR and kept ELNS, and 3) played COO(E)D and kept OHS. In the past, I probably would have either traded or burned some of my bingo-prone tiles off. The bad thing is that I didn’t listen to my "spidey sense" and it cost me the game.
FINAL SCORE: 358 – 305 (LOSS)
BINGOS: ME – none; Kaveri – InVITED
Game #3 vs. Fraser
I’d like to say that I was the victim of some poor tiles, but that wouldn’t be fair. Sure, Fraser did get a better share of the tiles, but he made some very smart plays. I only managed to pick up the Q, S and one blank. I challenged TWAINS and things sort of went downhill from there. After that, Fraser pulled ahead and then kept scoring and shutting down bingo lanes. I was doing my best to open things up, but couldn’t come-up with any high scoring plays. I was so far behind that I had to resort to making very risky plays and try to open up lanes everywhere. In the end, I just didn’t get the right tiles (in this game) to overcome that one challenge. I’m pretty sure that the general strategy was correct – I’m not sure that I made the best plays possible.
FINAL SCORE: 410 – 228 (LOSS)
BINGOS: ME – none; Fraser – ALIASEs
Unlike last week when I couldn’t seem to do anything wrong, this week as more of a challenge. Sure the losing sucks, but I learned a few things, so it’s not all bad.
On a side note, I’ve decided to participate in this year’s US National Scrabble® Championship in Orlando, FL and will be playing in division 4 (1100-1299). I’ve also decided to go on a tournament moratorium to prepare for the National Championship. Hopefully the extra studying will pay off with a strong performance. I’m going to get some additional practice in this weekend at Yvonne Lobo’s home – she’s hosting a few of us for some friendly games, but we’re all using it as practice for tournaments. I’ll be playing against Shaun Goatcher (he’s practicing for the upcoming Canadian Nationals), Yvonne Lobo, and Sam Hollington. I’ll probably get whupped, but that’s okay as I’ll get accustomed to playing against 1500+ players.
Powered by Qumana
Lessons learned from tournament mistakes March 13, 2008
Posted by Hans in Tips & Advice.add a comment
I’ve been playing competitive/tournament Scrabble® for almost two years now and have learned quite a bit about how to and how NOT to play the game – mostly from making mistakes. Here are some suggestions for players just picking up the game:
- KNOW THE RULES: This one sounds pretty obvious, but I think it’s important to state. I’ve seen too many players not know the rules and then either make procedural errors or get "bullied" by someone who seems to know the rules better. In a recent tournament, my opponent challenged a word of mine, but only wrote down one word on the challenge slip. When she got to the computer for adjudication, she wrote down another word – a violation of the rules. Had I known the rule, she would not have been able to add another word. If you’re not sure about the rules, call the director over for a ruling/clarification. However, I think it’s best to know the rule(s) for yourself.
- COUNT THE SCORE YOURSELF: Count your opponent’s play to verify the score. Your opponent can make calculation errors and announce an incorrect score. It’s in your best interest to make sure the play is scored correctly.
- ASK FOR A RECOUNT: Ask for a recount in games when the outcome is decided by <10 points. Counting and adding mistakes happen. A few points here or there can change the outcome of a game. I had a game in which I made an adding error (91+41 does NOT equal 121). I ended up losing the game by 8 points, but should have won the game!
- CONFIRM THE RECOUNT: Related to the above tip, I would add that you need to recount and confirm everything, especially if the score changes. I was victim to this during a tournament in Ottawa when I had won by 3 points. My opponent asked for a recount and "found" a scoring error that gave her 6 points. I wasn’t quite myself and took her word for it and ended-up losing the game. I only realized this error after the tournament was over and I was reviewing the game at home.
- USE YOUR TIME WISELY: Many players start off a bit unnerved being required to play with a clock and tend to go over time. I’m the exact opposite and tend not to use enough time on my turns. Regardless, you have 25 minutes to make your plays – use this time wisely either by budgeting time or by using the time to find better plays. Also remember that if you go over time, use the entire/full minute to think as you’re penalized by the minute.
- RELAX: This one was probably the hardest for me to learn. When I first started playing in tournaments, I was pretty excited and had the adrenaline going. I’d get psyched seeing good tiles and crushed with a loss or bad tiles. I’ve learned that playing is about controlling your emotions and riding out the highs and the lows.
Powered by Qumana
What would you play? March 7, 2008
Posted by Hans in Analysis.add a comment
So here’s a board situation that I found interesting in my game against Paul Wigley. The situation is presented below:
Hans: Turn 7 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O -> Hans HEMPQTZ 119 ------------------------------ Paul ####### 116 1|= V = ' =| --Tracking---------------------- 2| - I " C " - | DEEILLNORRSN?IOAGT?AT 3| - D ' U A | ILSSVYFMNUAA 4|' E W R O N G S '| EEEUATAJOOY 5| O W I - H | 6| " R " R E B O E " | 7| ' P I C K E R U N | 8|B L E A T D T =| 9| I F ' ' I ' | 10| " " " A E " | 11| - X | 12|' - ' - '| 13| - ' ' - | 14| - " " - | 15|= ' = ' =| ------------------------------
I’m curious to know what people would play with the tiles I had (HEMPQTZ). Here is what I was thinking:
- J10 – HEMP 42 points
- 9L – Z(I)P 36 points
- 2B – PH(I)Z 36 points
- J10 – HEP 32 points
- J10 HEM 39 points
I ended up playing option #2 Z(I)P because I didn’t feel comfortable with the leave if had played HEMP (QTZ). The ZIP play results in EHMQT as the leave, providing a bit more flexibility in terms of the next play for only 6 points less. Also, I was a bit concerned about playing HEMP because it provides a juicy bingo lane for my opponent. I thought that HEMP would be available to me on my next turn if I needed it, while ZIP might not. I briefly thought about Q(I) at 2C, but that play scored only 11 so I quickly dismissed it.
What would you have played in this situation? Any particular reason?
I looked at this game on Quackle, and I was surprised at the results. Here are the choices:
- C2 HEMP 45 points – I completely missed this play!
- J10 HEMP 42 points
- J9 THEM 40 points
- C2 TEMP 36 points
- J10 HEM 39 points
- J10 HEP 39 points
- 12J HEMP 32 points
- J10 METH 35 points
- 2B PH(I)Z 36 points
- 9K Z(I)P 36 points
Wow – my play of Z(I)P was the 10th "best" choice identified by Quackle. Other than C2 that I completely missed, Quackle seems to think taking the TLS and the resulting points is worth being stuck with QTZ. I’m not sure if I feel comfortable with Q and Z on my rack. I suppose this situation was still early enough in the game (turn #7) that you wouldn’t get stuck with the Q or the Z. Perhaps the thinking is that you can score with those two tiles because the board is still fairly open with plenty of tiles still unseen/unplayed.
Powered by Qumana
Sometimes you just can’t lose – club night (Mar. 06. 2008) March 6, 2008
Posted by Hans in Club Results.3 comments
Now that my two recent tournaments are over, it’s back to club games. Even though I didn’t do as well at the Saratoga Springs and Waterford tournaments as I had hoped, I feel pretty good about my game. With some additional study, I think I can be a dangerous player. Okay, onto the games…
Game #1 vs. Paul Wigley
This was an interesting game as I had a very interesting situation during the mid-game. I plan on simulating this situation and posting it here in a day or two for everyone to view (and comment), as I’d love to get some thoughts and opinions from others. Even though I didn’t bingo in this game, I had a string of eight turns where I didn’t score less than 25, with several plays in the high 30s and one in the high 40s, scoring about 260 points. While I didn’t have outstanding tiles, I took the points that seemed available to me.
FINAL SCORE: 364 – 339 (WIN)
BINGOS: ME – none; Paul – OVErSEE
Game #2 vs. Allan Brown
After a slow start, this game just got out of hand for Allan. I had an set of tiles that didn’t seem very promising to me: DIIIOS? I was thinking OIDIOID, but even that didn’t seem to work. I ended-up trading and apparently missed a bingo: SImIOID. Seeing the word now, I know it’s good, but I can say that I would not have found that play (besides, it didn’t play). There was one bingo available: IDIOcI(E)S, but trying to find that is a stretch for me. Maybe I need to study my 3I words.
Anyway, I got some fortunate tiles and was able to extract some big points and bingos. Allan seemed to be fishing for a bingo as he often does. While he was scoring 5-15 points, I was hitting him for 30+. By the time he got his first bingo, the score was 207 – 133 (for me) and I was still scoring, as I had 6 turns when I scored 340 points. Can’t expect to win when you’re not scoring. Craig’s been saying that I shouldn’t fish, but it sort of hit home during the Saratoga tournament when Sam Hollington also mentioned that the expert players don’t do that.
FINAL SCORE: 525 – 276 (WIN)
BINGOS: ME – TOONIeS, TABULA(T)E, (M)ISDEALS; Allan – R(E)FRAINs
Game #3 vs. Mark Hamilton
I was lucky in this game as I made two critical erros. I had an opening rack of EEEEEKW with absolutely no play because Mark opened with QI. Fortunately, I picked-up ERUDITE that I played incorrectly as UREDITE* – I wasn’t sure of the spelling, but I knew that one of those two were good. Mark missed another phoney word on that play – MIT*. That was error number one. My second mistake was playing KNOT M12. Right after I played it, I knew it was a mistake as I realized that I had opened up the TWS lane at the bottom of the board and also a juicy bingo lane for a word ending in S to make S(KI). Mark played ZINGS for 64 – sure it wasn’t a bingo, but it scored like one. The only saving grace I had was that I had built up a 100 point lead, which was whittled away. I have to be on the look-out for potentially calamitous moves. Now that I’m playing higher up at tournaments, a mistake or two will surely lead to a loss.
FINAL SCORE: 390 – 362 (WIN)
BINGOS: ME – UREDITE*, R(E)ACTING; Mark – IRONIeS
On a side note, Sam Hollington visited the club. I think he had a fun time playing against some expert players (and beating the too). Hopefully we’ll see him out more often – I know it’s a bit of a trek for him to come, but it’s nice to see some different faces at the club.
Powered by Qumana
A look at ratings #2 – the ELO system March 5, 2008
Posted by Hans in Analysis, Statistics.2 comments
In a previous post, I took a look at some of the statistical correlations between a player’s scoring averages and their Scrabble® rating. Over this past year, I’ve seen my own personal rating jump by over 400 points (in tournament play) and about 200 points at club play. Seems like everyone likes to talk about ratings – either theirs going up or down.
In this post, I’m taking a closer look at the rating system. For those of you who don’t know, here in North America, the National Scrabble® Association (NSA) uses the ELO system originally developed and still used for chess. I won’t go into too much detail, but this system is based on estimating a player’s "true skill" by using statistical measures of interpreting wins & losses.
The ELO rating system
Basically, each player has a rating. This rating is then compared with your opponent’s rating and an "expected" win % is determined based on how far apart you and your opponent’s ratings are. After each game is played, you calculate the difference between the expected % of wins and our performance. If two players are equal in skill, then in theory, they should each win 50% of the time against one another. A higher rating would thus suggest higher skill and higher likelihood of winning any particular game against lower rated players. The same works when playing against higher rated players. The theory is that over time, your true skill should be reflected in your rating because your "good and bad" playing should even out over time and your true rating should emerge.
For a more detailed explanation of the ELO system, please view the Wikipedia entry titled "Elo rating system".
Complaints about the rating system(s) in Scrabble
In the recent issue of Scrabble News (#218 I believe), there was a note about the formation of a ratings committee. This group is going to suggest an alternative ratings formula and come-up with something for use by 2009. I’m not sure why people feel a need to change the current system, but I’ve heard the following complaints:
- Ratings have been decreasing/"deflating" (read below for some more info about this)
- Point "spreads" should be acknowledged – for example a player winning by 500 points should be recognized
- Similar to the point above, "all wins aren’t equal"
- It’s too easier to "lose" rating points but harder to gain them
Personally, I’m not sure what all the complaining and clamoring is all about. No system is perfect. In science, it’s what we call "measurement error" in that every measurement we take has some sort of error involved. For things like measuring the height of something, we can be pretty good, but with things like measuring someone’s intelligence, it can be hit or miss.
Ratings deflation in Scrabble®
In the case of people complaining about ratings "going down", the Wikipedia entry has a very interesting example that describes this phenomenon of ratings decreasing even though a player’s skill level remains the same (it’s about halfway through the section titled "ratings inflation and deflation"). Because of the way the system is set-up, if only a few players improve their skill while everyone else stays the same, what happens is that the player who got better gets a big jump in ratings while the others who stayed the same decrease in ratings – thus the "deflation".
I believe this is what is happening in Scrabble today. Players who used to be in the 1500-1600 range have had their ratings drop a good 200-300 points in the past few years. What I’ve seen as a new player is that more players are getting better and at a quicker rate. We can see this in some of the younger players getting involved, but mostly because of the better study tools available. Computer simulation software allows players to analyze games and become better. We also see this in the decreasing number of (active) players in the 1900s and 2000s. What we don’t see, however, is a change in the relative rankings of players. The top players are still at the top in roughly the same order as they were before. It’s those players who haven’t improved much over the past few years who have seen their ratings plummet. They aren’t any worse than they were before. It’s just that everyone else is getting better and so gaining and/or maintaining a rating is much more difficult.
In my example, based on my play at my local club, I’ve felt that I was about a 1150-1250 player and yet my tournament/NSA rating was about 800 for over a year. Once I figured out a few things about playing in tournaments, particularly about playing against lower rated players, I’ve seen my rating jump 400+ points to about 1205 (estimated). I’ve jumped up so much because my true level of play is higher than 800. Now that I’m at the 1200 level, I don’t expect to see much gains in my rating until I start improving again. Those people who I beat would see their rating go down, not because they played poorly, but because they played someone who was rated lower than them. Similarly, I would expect it very difficult to keep my rating if I start to play against opponents who are getting better. We’re all on this treadmill of needing to improve or else see our ratings go down.
What people also complain about is the fact that unlike in chess, Scrabble® involves quite a bit of randomness and luck. Sometimes you get some crappy tiles and it’s almost impossible to win. Unfortunately, there’s really not much to do. In the card game Bridge, the solution was to create "duplicate bridge", where every team plays the exact same hands/cards. The theory is that if everyone plays the same cards/hand then those with better skill should do better. It’s like having everyone take a standardized test and getting a score. Unfortunately, I don’t think this is likely to happen in Scrabble.
Final thoughts
So after a brief look at the ELO system, I’m not sure if any new system that may (or may not be introduced) will fair any better. Personally, I think the secret is not to worry about the rating and focus on just becoming a better player. The ratings will take care of themselves.
Powered by Qumana
Waterford 2008 – final recap March 2, 2008
Posted by Hans in Tournament Results.add a comment
Here’s the final recap of the Waterford, MI tournament. I wasn’t able to post any updates during the day so I’m summarizing everything at once. If you wish to view the final standings of the tournament, you can view them here on the tournament site – not sure if this link will be permanent or not. As noted, I played in Division B.
Game #1 vs. Rob Long (1488 rating)
A close game that Rob pulled out at the end. Rob played a few words that I didn’t recognize, but they were all good. I did a quick review of this game and I think I could have won, had I recognized the anagram of TENNIES (INTENSE). That cost me a turn. I was able to tie the score with RESHINE that Rob considered challenging. I managed to get a one point lead, but couldn’t prevent Rob from going out. All in all, a fair game. I hope to play Rob again in the future.
FINAL SCORE: 399- 381 (LOSS)
BINGOS: ME – CH(A)RTERS, RESHINE; Rob – TIDIesT
RECORD: 0 – 1 (-18)
Game #2 vs. Frank Lee (1415 rating)
I had a bingo on my first turn and spent far too much time trying to find a play to the TWS. For some reason, my brain wasn’t working very well (could be because I didn’t get to sleep until 5:30am that day). I was able to stay close until Frank played his bingo. After that the game sort of got out of hand. Not recognizing two phoney plays didn’t help: BIPODAL* and MARLE*. Frank played some exotic words like YATAGAN and WOAD that sort of made me think he knew his words. Guess I was mistaken. Frank is definitely a character, but a very nice guy. Sorta reminds me of the gnome from the Travelocity commercials because of the long beard and big hat he wears during games.
FINAL SCORE: 456 – 330 (LOSS)
BINGOS: ME – FAInTER; Frank – OUTPLaNS
RECORD: 0 – 2 (-144)
Game #3 vs. Janet Gray (1361 rating)
After two losses, I was getting a bit discouraged, especially when Brenda bingoed early on. I can’t think of any particular play that stood out, but I played a solid game with the tiles I had. I picked-up the blank at the very end and fortunately, I was able to score 34 points with it to win the game. I let a phoney play go – PRIVATED*. After Janet played her bingo, I wondered if it could take a D hook. She got to it first and even though I held her on the play, I let it go. Maybe I just chickened out because of the two early losses.
FINAL SCORE: 377 – 349 (WIN)
BINGOS: ME – none; Janet – PRIVaTE
RECORD: 1 – 2 (-116)
Game #4 vs. Michael Garner (1240 rating)
Not sure how this game got out of hand, but looking it over, it just did. I wasn’t scoring enough because I was fishing or a bingo. I seemed to be one or two tiles away from a bingo for too many turns. Instead of taking the points, I made too many sub-optimal plays. Sure Michael had slightly better tiles, but he definitely made good use of them.
FINAL SCORE: 432 – 291 (LOSS)
BINGOS: ME – STINGER; Michael – SWooNED
RECORD: 1 – 3 (-257)
Game #5 vs. Jason Belter (1351 rating)
This game irks me. I made the mistake of accepting a play too quickly – in my head, I saw QUOTA but when I turned the board around, Jason played QOUTA* by accident (48 points!). He was decent enough to offer to remove the play, but I declined because I had already accepted the play. Jason’s a cool guy – not a great speller though as he tried to play iNTeREM. In a later game, I saw him play SHADDOW* that Vera quickly challenged off. Again, Jason seemed to get slightly better tiles, but nothing crazy. Granted, having both blanks is a big bonus.
FINAL SCORE: 357 – 318 (LOSS)
BINGOS: ME – BEANIES; Jason – MENToRs
RECORD: 1 – 4 (-296)
Game #6 vs. Wayne Kraus (1217 rating)
This game was very close and tight throughout, until I decided to trade some tiles – I had AAEIINO. I traded AAIO and picked up CEEI. Wayne plays JAM (40 points) and HER (35 points) essentially ending the game because the board was shut down. A tought loss, but it happens. With the one blank I had, I managed to play ZeROS for 66 points. What can you do? Kevin Turner seems to have a hex from Wayne as Kevin lost three games to Wayne this weekend. If that happened to me, I’d go crazy.
FINAL SCORE: 370 – 272 (LOSS)
BINGOS: none
RECORD: 1 – 5 (-394)
Game #7 vs. Margaret Sutherland (1293 rating)
Man these losses suck. I had to trade twice in my first three turns with racks like EIIOOST and EEIIITU. Later, I made another trade with a rack of EFIIRUU – ugh even looking at that makes me shake my head. Anyway, even with those lost turns, I was able to stay tied with Margaret. She then played BOATeLS and took my bingo spot. I decided to challenge it and lost another turn. I did my best to catch-up, but she then got a bit fortunate to make plays like FUCI (35) and WAD (34) to get a huge lead. I managed to reel her in a bit with a late bingo, but by then it was too late. I noticed that Margaret gets a bit flustered when the board gets a bit cramped and also when she doesn’t get the best tiles.
FINAL SCORE: 389 – 325 (LOSS)
BINGOS: ME – LInGERS; Margaret – BOATeLS
RECORD: 1 – 6 (-458)
Game #8 vs. Linda Hoggatt (1320 rating)
I finally got some good tiles and I was able to make some good scoring plays. Linda was able to keep up for most of the game with a few 40+ point plays, but Kept on scoring. I had a late bingo that I thought she would challenge, but didn’t. I mistracked her tiles and so I didn’t shut the board down. To her credit, Linda found a great play DEVIAT(E)S to end the game. She got an additional 28 points for the tiles I had. At the end, I picked up VVUUW to empty the bag. Not much you can do with that.
FINAL SCORE: 446 – 412 (WIN – yeah!)
BINGOS: ME – TRAILiN(G), GOALERS* (I put the A and the O in the wrong order), LINESME(N); Linda – DEVIAT(E)S
RECORD: 2 – 6 (-424)
END OF DAY #1
I was glad to see the day end – partly because of the challenging tiles, but mostly because I was dead tired. Winning the last game of the day felt good, but I was still quite frustrated. Even though I was playing up a division, I don’t feel out of place. A few of the guys at the Mississauga club chided me about my "poor" showing at the Saratoga Springs tournament this past wee. I guess they think I should play better.
Game #9 vs. Jason Smith (1437 rating)
I ended up winning this game, but I’m still surprised at the outcome. My "winning" play was when I had FIIJSUY and I was able to JUS(T)IFY, scoring 40+ points and clearing a seemingly ugly set of tiles. I didn’t get many bingo prone tiles this game, but I did my best to score with what I had. I tried to keep the board open and give myself a shot at a win. Sure felt good to start the day off with a win.
FINAL SCORE: 375 – 336 (WIN!)
BINGOS: ME – VENURE; Jason – LoITERS, MIRaGES
RECORD: 3 – 6 (-385)
Game #10 vs. Kit Morehead (1429 rating)
After a surprising win, I was looking forward for my next win. Unfortunately, I made one bad mistake and it sort of snowballed from there. I had a small lead and decided to trade tiles as my set was AAAIIIS – what is with these tiles? After Saratoga, I thought for sure I was done with racks like that. Anyway, Kit then plays GuILD(E)Ns.* The play didn’t look too good to me and I held it for a good minute or two before grudgingly accepting the play. For some reason, I "talked" myself into thinking that the word was some variant of GILDED/to be covered with metal. Apparently Kevin was trying to signal to me that he didn’t like the word, but his brain waves never reached me. After that play, I had to open up the board and then Kit bingoed with the opening(s) I made. At the end, I had SNOWIER but Kit blocked my lane, preventing me from playing RESOWIN(G). If Kit made a calculated play of that bingo, thinking I wouldn’t challenge, that was very smart of her.
FINAL SCORE: 423 – 263 (LOSS)
BINGOS: ME – none; Kit – GUILD(E)NS*
RECORD: 3 – 7 (-545)
Game #11 vs. Vera Bigall (1395 rating)
What a laugher of a game. I was looking forward to playing Vera, but unfortunately this game was a blow-out. Vera had decent tiles, but she seemed to have the right tiles at the right time to make some very high scoring plays like ZO(W)IE for 78. I can’t take anything from her as she made some very good plays. Hopefully if I get a chance to play her again, I’ll give her more of a challenge.
FINAL SCORE: 438 – 332 (LOSS)
BINGOS: ME – none; Vera – VIRAGO(E)S – nice play
RECORD: 3 – 8 (-651)
Game #12 vs. Stephen Knapp (1455 rating)
This game was very enjoyable because of how close it ended up being. Because I was playing off Is early on (I ended up with 7 of the 9 Is), the board got somewhat congested. Stephen made some plays to score. The end game was very interesting and I’m not sure that there’s anything I could have done better with the tiles I had. I’m definitely going to review this game on Quackle. After the game, I spent a good 20 minutes reviewing my final plays, and I don’t see how I could have won given the tiles I had. Nevertheless, the game was enjoyable as I played a very good game (in my opinion). The score should have been closer, but I made a desperation play of CRON* that got challenged off. I was hoping that CRON* would be good from the Unix world of CRON jobs. If he accepted the play, I could have won by a point, otherwise I would have lost no matter what.
UPDATE #1: I reviewed the game on Quackle and with the tiles I had given the plays I made, there was no chance I could win in the final 3-4 turns. The only possible way that the outcome might have been different (assuming the tiles remained about the same) was back at turn #9 of 16. I played BUSY for 27 when a better play of USABLy for 50 was available. That was probably the deciding factor as Stephen played his bingo thereafter. However, even if I had played USABLY, there was no way I could prevent Stephen from playing a bingo for identical points. Once I figure out how to FTP the game file on my Macbook, I’ll upload the game. I missed a few bingos earlier in the game. The only one that I had a reasonable chance at fining was INT(E)RAGE.
FINAL SCORE: 395 – 364 (LOSS)
BINGOS: ME – TINIEST; Steven – HOaRDER, TENSoRS
RECORD: 4 – 9 (-682)
Game #13 vs. Pat Badgley (1363 rating)
A very strange game that I don’t completely understand. One very notable play was my first scoring play. After trading my first turn, I had AEILNRT. Pat had played BEAMED. I didn’t see anything immediately obvious for a shot at either the TWS (E was on the start) or a double-double. I played RATLINE making six overlapping words. Steve Knapp was sitting next to Pat and looked over at the board and was impressed. The rest of the game was a bit weird because I was able to pull out a big lead and yet Pat started shutting the board down. She closed the gap a bit with a good bingo (HEADLINER). I was a bit too eager to try to end the game because I made a mistake and played LISTENS/NAOIS*. After that, Pat was making dinky plays – I think she was expecting me to open things up. The score was a bit closer than the game was because I picked up Os, Is, and As on my last few turns. If we play again, I think I can beat her given similar tiles.
FINAL SCORE: 364 – 351 (WIN – finally)
BINGOS: ME – RATLINE; Pat – (HE)ADlINER (that’s HEADLINER)
RECORD: 4 – 9 (-669)
Game #14 vs. Magaret Sutherland (1293 rating)
The game got closed very quickly. I tried opening up the board, but decided to keep the game fairly tight seeing as how Margaret seemed visibly upset with how the board was developing. I think she got frustrated and started to open things up. At about that time, my tiles started to turn for the better and that’s when I made her pay. She found a final bingo to end the game, but by then it was too late.
FINAL SCORE: 390 – 334 (WIN)
BINGOS: ME – TRAINE(E)S, ANISEEd, DELAINE; Margaret – RENAILs
RECORD: 5 – 9 (-613)
Game #15 vs. Frank Lee (1415 rating)
I was looking for some revenge for an earlier loss. After a slow start, both of us started scoring points. Frank jumped out to a sizeable lead with two bingos and then I did my best to try and catch him. With my final rack, I picked up the QIZROST and thought "oh my god" because the board was getting pretty closed, thinking that I might need to eat either the Q or Z. After that moment of panic, I spent my time analyzing the end game and pull out a win.
FINAL SCORE: 364 – 347 (WIN)
BINGOS: ME – ROTaTES; Frank – HOLLER(E)D, SWARDED
RECORD: 6 – 9 (-598)
I managed to finish with a final record of 6-9 (-596). There were a few games that were quite disheartening and others that were very interesting and challenging. As expected, a few were blow-outs that completely killed my point differential/spread. I didn’t quite make my goal of 8 wins, but I guess that’s how it goes. I finished tied for 11th place, but because of my poor spread, I ended up in 13th spot. My tentative rating is 1205 (+49 points).
I did a quick count and I had 11 blanks out of 30 for the weekend, even though it felt as if my opponents had far more than that. In terms of bingos, I had 16 compared with 18 for my opponents. In my six wins, I had 9 bingos. Considering that I lost most of my games, the low bingo tally doesn’t surprise me too much.
With my new (unofficial) rating of 1205, I think I’m about where I should be. I think I’m about a 1200-1250 level player. In terms of board vision and strategy, I think I may play a bit higher, as evidenced by my play versus higher rated players, but my greatest weakness seems to be word knowledge (or lack thereof). Without any significant study, I don’t expect to see any more significant ratings gains. I’m going to play in fewer tournaments in the near future as I don’t like scraping by at the bottom of the division. Instead, I’m going to put in some time and effor to study to give myself a better chance at winning the division/tournament.
In terms of Kevin and Vera, my pre-tournament predictions didn’t come to fruition.
- Kevin finished 6.5 – 8.5 (+30) for 10th place. After a promising start he had a difficult second day – losing to Wayne Krauss three times on the second day.
- Vera did a bit better at 8.5 – 6.5 (+13) for 7th place.
Powered by Qumana